Kinship terms in Uralic, Iranian, and Turkic languages (supplementary materials)

Materials compiled by:

• Veronika Milanova (University of Vienna / Austrian Academy of Sciences, veronika.milanova@univie.ac.at)
• Sampsa Holopainen (University of Helsinki, sampsa.holopainen@helsinki.fi)
• Jeremy Bradley (University of Vienna, jeremy.moss.bradley@univie.ac.at)
• András Czentnár (Eötvös Loránd University, czandrish@freemail.hu)

Last update: 5 November 2019

Downloads

Handouts and posters

• Slides for ICIL 9, August 18–20, 2021.
• Handout for the talk “Iranian terms for siblings in the genealogical, areal, and typological perspectives – Proliferation of relative age distinction in New Iranian languages (pilot study)”, Ninth European Conference of Iranian Studies (ECIS 9), Berlin, 9–13 September 2019
• Poster for SLE 2019, Leipzig, August 21–24, 2019.
• Handout for SLE 2019, Leipzig, August 21–24, 2019.
• Handout for the talk “The areal factor in formation of kinship terminologies” at the XIII Congress of Anthropologists and Ethnologists of Russia, Kazan, 2–6 July 2019.
• Updated version of handout for the international colloquium on loanwords and substrata in Indo-European languages in Limoges, 4th–7th June 2018 (map used in presentation, table of kinship terms)
• Poster for the international conference (CSF workshop) “VARIATIONist Linguistics meets CONTACT Linguistics”, Ascona, May 20–23, 2018
• Poster for the conference “Variation and contact in the Ancient Indo-European languages”, Pisa, April 19–20, 2018.

Our common articles

• Milanova, Veronika; Holopainen, Sampsa; Bradley, Jeremy (forthcoming): Contact phenomena in Indo-European kinship and social terms and beyond (a pilot study with special focus on the Iranian and Uralic languages in the context of Central Eurasia). In: Romain Garnier et al. Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Loanwords and Substrata in Indo-European languages (Limoges, France, 4th–7th June 2018), IBS. (submitted on 20.11.2018)

Further materials

• Demonstration of visualization tool for etymologies

Veronika Milanova's articles

• Indo-European kinship terms as an interdisciplinary topic (Reconstruction of social realities – anthropological views and methodological considerations). In: Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead & Birgit Anette Olsen (eds). Kin, clan and community in prehistoric Europe. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press (2019 in print) (Book on amazon.com)
• ^MUNUS/fduttarii̯ata/i- and some other Indo-European maidens. In: Hrozný and Hittite: The First Hundred Years. Proceedings of the International Conference Held at Charles University, Prague, 11–14 November 2015, edited by Ronald I. Kim, Jana Mynářová, and Peter Pavúk with the assistance of Dita Frantíková and Petr Zemánek. Leiden: Brill (2019 in print) (Book on brill.com)

Abbreviations

• Av = Avestan
• Bal = Baluchi
• IIr = Indo-Iranian
• Khanty:
  • Kaz.. = Kazym dialect (North Khanty)
  • O = Obdorsk dialect (North Khanty)
  • V = Vakh dialect (East Khanty)
• Kurd = Kurdish
• Mansi:
  • L = Lozva dialect (West Mansi)
  • LO = Upper Lozva dialect (West Mansi)
  • LU = Lower Lozva dialect (North Mansi)
• Mari:
  • E = Eastern dialects, W = Western dialects
• Mordvin:
  • E = Erzya, M = Moksha
• MP = Middle Persian
• NP = New Persian (Farsi, Tajik, Dari unless specified)
• OI = Old Indic
• OHu = Old Hungarian
• OP = Old Persian
• Oss = Ossetic (Iron and Digor unless specified)
• PIE = Proto-Indo-European
• PII = Proto-Indo-Iranian
• PI = Proto-Iranian
• PU = Proto-Uralic
• PS = Proto-Samoyedic
• Skt = Sanskrit
• Taj = Tajik
• YAv = Young Avestan

References

• Abaev = Abaev, V.I. 1958-1989. Istoriko-etimologičeskiy slovar osetinskogo yazyka. (A historical-etymological dictionary of Ossetic). Vol. 1-5. Moscow & Leningrad.
• ----------------- K alano-vengerskim leksičeskim svyazyam. In: Europa et Hungaria: Congressus ethnographicus in Hungaria. Budapest. 517–537.
• ----------------- 1970. Уырыссаг-ирон дзырдуат [Russian-Ossetic/Iron dictionary]. Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya.
• Abondolo, Daniel. 1998. Introduction. In: Daniel Abondolo (ed). The Uralic languages. London & New York: Routledge, 1–42.
• Agyagási, Klára. 2019. Chuvash Historical Phonetics. Turcologica 117. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
• Ahlqvist, August. 1871. De vestfinska språkens kulturord. Ett linguistiskt bidrag tillFinnarnes äldsta kulturhistoria. Helsingfors: SKS.
• Aikio, Ante; Kallio, Petri. 2005. Zu Hartmut Katz: Studien zu den älteren indoiranischen Lehnwörtern in den uralischen Sprachen. Aus dem Nachlass herausgegeben von Paul Widmer, Anna Widmer und Gerson Klumpp. Die Sprache: Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 45, 212–222.
• Aikio, Ante. 2002. New and old Samoyed etymologies. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 57, 9–57. [www.academia.edu/4811799/New_and_Old_Samoyed_Etymologies]
• ----------------- 2006. New and old Samoyed etymologies (Part II). Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 59, 9–34. [www.academia.edu/4811803/New_and_Old_Samoyed_Etymologies_Part_2]
• ----------------- 2012. On Finnic long vowels, Samoyed vowel sequences, and Proto-Uralic *x. In: Tiina Hyytiäinen, Lotta Jalava, Janne Saarikivi & Erika Sandman (eds). Per Urales ad Orientem. Iter polyphonicum multilingue. Festskrift tillägnad Juha Janhunen på hans sextioårsdag den 12 februari 2012. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 264. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura, 227–250. [www.sgr.fi/sust/sust264/sust264_aikio.pdf]
• ----------------- 2013. Uralilaisen kantakielen vokaalistosta. Presentation at the seminar “Etymologia ja kielihistoria: Erkki Itkosen ja Aulis J. Joen 100-vuotisjuhlaseminaari” 19.4.2013, Helsinki.
• ----------------- 2014. On the reconstruction of Proto-Mari vocalism. Journal of language relationship 11, 125–157. [www.jolr.ru/files/(142)jlr2014-11(125-158).pdf]
• ----------------- 2015. The Finnic ‘secondary e-stems’ and Proto-Uralic vocalism. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 95. 26–66. [journal.fi/susa/article/view/82642]
• ----------------- (to appear). Proto-Uralic. In: Marianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso & Elena Skribnik (eds.). The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Draft published at www.academia.edu/40193033/Proto-Uralic]
• Akhmetyanov, Rifkat G. 1981. Общая лексика духовной культуры народов Среднего Поволжья. Moscow: Nauka
• Álgu-tietokanta. Sámegielaid etymologalaš diehtovuođđu = Etymological database of the Saami languages. Helsinki: Centre for the languages of Finland. Constantly updated. kaino.kotus.fi/algu/. Last accessed April 2018.
• Aliakbari, Mohammad; Toni, Arman. 2008. The Realization of Address Terms in Modern Persian in Iran: A Sociolinguistic Study. In: Linguistik online 35, 3/08.
• Ansari, Zakia R.; Shabnam, Srushti; Priyadarshi, Brajesh. 2015. Kinship terms of Urdu in Mysore and Lucknow varieties: a comparative study. In: Indian Linguistics 76 (1-2), 113-130.
• Anttila, Raimo. 2006. Review of Katz (2003). Journal of Indo-European studies 34, 231–236.
• Ásbóth, Oszkár. 1935. A magyar nyelv árja és kaukázusi elemei. (Ötödik közlemény.) Nyelvtudományi közlemények 35, 50–70. [www.nytud.hu/nyk/reg/035.pdf]
• Asatrian, Garnik S. 2018 (forthcoming). Etymological Dictionary of Persian (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary). Leiden: Brill.
• Bárczi, Géza. 1959–1962. A magyar nyelv értelmező szótára. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
• Bartholomae, Christian. 1904. Altiranisches Wörterbuch. Strassburg: K. J. Trübner.
• Bateni, M.R. 1973. Kinship terms in Persian. In: Anthropological linguistics 15, 324-7.
• Benkő, Loránd al. 1993-1995. Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Ungarischen. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
• Bereczki, Gábor. 1992–1994. Grundzüge der tscheremissischen Sprachgeschichte [I–II]. Studia Uralo-Altaica 34–35. Szeged: Universitas Szegediensis de Attila József Nominata.
• Bereczki, Gábor et al. 2013. Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Tscheremissischen (Mari). Veröffentlichungen des Societas Uralo-Altaica 86. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
• Bíro, Bernadett. 2004. A vogul rokonságnevek rendszere és morfológiai felépítése. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 101, 32–56. [www.nytud.hu/nyk/101/birovogrok.pdf]
• Boikova, Elena V.; Rybakov, Rostislav B. (eds). 2006. Kinship in the Altaic World: Proceedings of the 48th Permanent International Altaistic Conference, Moscow 10–15 July, 2005. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
• Bradley, Jeremy. 2014. Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Tscheremissischen (Mari). [review] Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen 39, 157–166.
• ----------------- 2016. Mari converb constructions: productivity and regional variance. [manuscript of PhD thesis] Vienna: University of Vienna. [othes.univie.ac.at/43606/]
• Bregel, Yuri. 1991. Turko-Mongol influences in Central Asia. In: Robert L. Canfield (ed). Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53–77.
• Campbell, Lyle. 1999. Historical linguistics: an introduction. [1st edition] Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Carruba, Onofrio. 1995. Die Verwandtschaftsnamen auf -ter des Indogermanischen. In: Wojciech Smoczyński (ed). Kuryłowicz Memorial Volume. Volume I. Cracow: Universitas.
• Carsten, Janet (ed). 2000. Cultures of relatedness: New Approaches the the Studies of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• CPD = MacKenzie, D. N. 1986 [1971]. A Concise Pahlavi Dictionary. London: Oxford University Press.
• Cheung, Johnny. 2002. Studies in the historical development of the Ossetic vocalism. Beiträge zur Iranistik, Band 21. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.
• Chyet, Michel L. 2003. Kurdish-English Dictionary: Kurmanji-English (with selected etymologies by Martin Schwarz). New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
• Clauson, Gerard. 1972. An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-Thirteenth-Century Turkish. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• CLI = Schmitt, Rüdiger (ed). 1989. Compendium Linguarum Iranicarum. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.
• Dahl, Östen; Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2001. Kinship in grammar. In: Irène Baroh, Michael Helsund & Finn Sørensen (eds). Dimensions of Possession. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 201–225.
• Damgaard, Peter de Barros et al. 2018. The horse herders and the impact of early Bronze Age steppe expansions into Asia. Science 10.1126/science aar.7711. [with linguistic and archaeological supplements)]
• Database of Kurdish Dialects: kurdish.humanities.manchester.ac.uk/database-of-kurdish-dialects/.
• Dekhoda, Ali Akbar; Moin, Mohammad; Shahidi, Jafar et al. 1946–1975 [1931]. Loġat-nāme-ye Dehkhodā. 14 Vols. Tehran: Tehran University Press.
• Delbrück, Berthold. 1889. Die Indogermanischen Verwandtschaftsnamen. Ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden Altertumskunde. Abhandlungen der philologisch-historischen Classe der Königlichen Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften XI/5, 381–606.
• DEWOS = Steinitz, Wolfgang (hrsg.). 1966–1993. Dialektologisches und etymologisches Wörterbuch des ostjakishen Sprache. Berlin: Akademie Verlag
• Doerfer = Doerfer, Gerhard. 1963-1975. Türkische und mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen: unter besonderer Berücksichtigung älterer neupersischer Geschichtsquellen, vor allem der Mongolen- und Timuridenzeit. Vol. 1-4. Wiesbaden: Steiner.
• ----------------- 1967. Türkische Lehnwörter im Tadschikischen. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.
• ----------------- 1988. Grundwort und Sprachmischung. Eine Untersuchung an Hand von Körperteilbezeichnungen. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden GmbH.
• Durkin, Philip. 2014. Borrowed Words. A History of Loanwords in English. Oxford University Press.
• EDAL = Starostin, Sergei A.; Dybo, Anna V.; Mudrak, Oleg A. 2003. Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages. Vols. I–III. Leiden: Brill.
• Egorov, Vasliy G. 1964. Этимологический словарь чувашского языка. Cheboksary: Chuvashskoye knizhnoye izdatel’stvo.
• ESIYA = Vera S. Rastorgueva – Dzhoy I. Edel’man. 2000–2015. Этимологический словарь иранских языков. Vols. I–V. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura.
• EWAia = Mayrhofer, Manfred. 1986–2001. Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Altindoarischen. Vols. I–III. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter
• EWUNG = Benkő, Loránd (hrsg.). 1993–1997. Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Ungarischen. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó
• Fedotov, Mikhail R. 1996. Этимологический словарь чувашского языка. Vols. I–II. Cheboksary: Chuvashskiy Gosudarstvennyy Institut.
• Feinberg R.; Ottenheimer, M. (eds). 2001. The Cultural Analysis of Kinship. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
• Fragner, Bert G. 1999. Die „Persophonie“: Regionalität, Identität und Sprachkontakt in der Geschichte Asiens. Berlin: Das Arabische Buch.
• Garnier, Roman; Sagart, Laurent. 2016. Milk and the Indo-Europeans. In: Martine Robbeets (ed). Language Dispersal Beyond Farming. (Actes du Workshop: The language of the first farmers, SLE 2016, Naples). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Gates, Henry P. 1971. The kinship terminology of Homeric Greek. Memoir 27 of the International Journal of American Linguistics. Baltimore: Waverly Press.
• Gershevitch, Ilya. 1973. Genealogical descent in Iranian. In: Philologia Iranica, 265-277.
• Goddard, Cliff. 2005. The Languages of East and Southeast Asia: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Goddard, C.; Wierzbicka A. 2014. Words and Meanings. Lexical Semantics across Domains, Languages, and Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Golden, Peter Benjamin. 1992. An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples: Ethnogenesis and State-Formation in Medieval and Early Modern Eurasia and the Middle East. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
• Grünthal, Riho. 2014. Das lange erwartete etymologische Wörterbuch des Mari (Gábor Bereczki: Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Tscheremissischen (Mari): Der einheimische Wortschatz). Finnisch Ugrische-Forschungen 62, 496–509.
• Gugán, Katalin. 2013. A honfoglalás előtti török–magyar érintkezésekről a Thomason–Kaufman féle kölcsönzési skála tükrében. In: Klára Agyagási, Attila Hegedűs & Katalin É. Kiss (eds). Nyelvelmélet és kontaktológia 2. Piliscsaba: PPKE BTK, 206–226.
• Hajdú, Péter; Domokos, Péter. 1978. Uráli nyelvrokonaink. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.
• Häkkinen, Jaakko. 2009. Kantauralin ajoitus ja paikannus: perustelut puntarissa. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 92, 9–56. [www.sgr.fi/susa/92/hakkinen.pdf]
• Häkkinen, Kaisa. 1984. Wäre es schon an der Zeit, den Stammbaum zu fällen? Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher, Neue Folge 4, 1–24.
• Hall, Edward T. 1989 [1976]. Beyond Culture. New York: Anchor Books Doubleday.
• Haspelmath, Martin. 2008. Loanword typology: Steps toward a systematic cross-linguistic study of lexical borrowability. In: Stolz, Thomas; Bakker, Dik; Salas Palomo, Rosa (eds). Aspects of Language Contact: New Theoretical, Methodological and Empirical Findings with Special Focus on Romancisation Processes. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology [EALT] 35. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
• Hassandust = Hassandust, Mohammad. 2015. The etymological dictionary of Persian. 5 Vols. Tehran: Academy of Persian Language and Literature.
• ----------------- Farhang-e riše-šenaḫti-ye zabān-e fārsi. Vols. I–V. Tehran: Academy of Persian Language and Literature.
• Helimski, Eugene. 2001. Zu den iranischen Lehnwörtern in Ungarischen. Manuscript of a presentation held in the symposium Finno-Ugrians and Indo-Europeans: Linguistic and Literary Contacts, November 22-24, 2001, Groningen/NL.
• ----------------- 2003 Areal groupings (Sprachbünde) within and across the borders of the Uralic language family. A survey. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 100, 156–167. [www.nytud.hu/nyk/100/helimski.pdf]
• ----------------- 2004. An outline history of the Samoyed people. In: György Nanovfszky (ed). The Finno-Ugric World. Budapest: Teleki László Foundation, 119–133.
• Hock, Hans Henrich; Brian D. Joseph. 1996. Language history, language change, and language relationship. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Holopainen, Sampsa. 2016. On the etymology of Hungarian úr ‘lord, gentleman’. Folia Uralica Debreceniensia 23, 57–68. [finnugor.arts.unideb.hu/fud/fud23/fud23.pdf]
• ----------------- 2018. Indo-Iranian loans confined to Saami? In: Sampsa Holopainen & Janne Saarikivi (eds). Perì orthótētos etýmōn. Uusiutuva uralilainen etymologia. Uralica Helsingiensia 11. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura, 135–179.
• Holopainen, Sampsa; Santeri Junttila; Juha Kuokkala. 2017. Indoeurópai jövevényszavak és a második szótagi labiális magánhangzók fejlődése az uráli nyelvekben. In: Tamás Forgács, Miklós Németh & Balázs Sinkovics (eds). Nyelvtörténei kutatások újabb eredményei. Szeged: University of Szeged, 109–136.
• Holý, Ladislav. 1996. Anthropological Perspectives on Kinship. London & Chicago: Pluto Press.
• Honti, László. 1998. Ob-Ugrian. In: Daniel Abondolo (ed.). The Uralic languages. London & New York: Routledge. 327–357.
• Horn, Paul. 1988 [1893]. Grundriss der neupersischen Etymologie. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag [Strassburg: Verlag von Karl J. Trübner].
• Isanbaev, N. I. 1989–1994. Mariysko-tyurkskie yazykovye kontakty [I-II]. Yoshkar-Ola: Mariyskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo.´
• Jacobsohn, Hermann. 1922. Arier und Ugrofinnen. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.
• Jafarov, J. M. (ed). 1971. Deutsch-aserbaidshanisches Wörterbuch. Baku: „Maarif“ Našriyyati.
• Janhunen, Juha. 1977. Samojedischer Wortschatz: gemeinsamojedische Etymologien. Castrenianumin toimitteita 17; Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto.
• ----------------- 1998. Samoyedic. In: Daniel Abondolo (ed.). The Uralic languages. London and New York: Routledge. 457–479.
• ----------------- 2009. Proto-Uralic: what, where and when? In: Jussi Ylikoski (ed). The quasquicentennial of the Finno-Ugrian Society. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 258. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura, 57–78. [www.sgr.fi/sust/sust258/sust258_janhunen.pdf]
• Johanson, Lars; Csató, Éva Á. (eds), 1998. The Turkic Languages. London & New York: Routledge.
• Joki, Aulis. 1973. Uralier und Indogermaner. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 151. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
• Jones, Doug. 2010. Human kinship, from conceptual structure to grammar. Behavioral and Brain Science 33, 367–416.
• Juntttila, Santeri. 2015. Tiedon kumuloituminen ja trendit lainasanatutkimuksessa. Kantasuomen balttilaislainojen tutkimushistoria. Doctoral dissertation; Helsinki. [helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/158777/tiedonku.pdf?sequence=2]
• Kakuk, Zsuzsa. 1976. Mai török nyelvek I: Bevezetés. Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.
• Kallio, Petri. 2006. Suomen kantakielten absoluuttista kronologiaa [On the absolute chronology of the proto-languages of Finnic]. Virittäjä 1/2006 (110), 2–25. [www.kotikielenseura.fi/virittaja/hakemistot/jutut/2006_2.pdf]
• ----------------- 2012. The non-initial-syllable vowel reductions from Proto-Uralic to Proto-Finnic. In: Tiina Hyytiäinen, Lotta Jalava, Janne Saarikivi & Erika Sandman (eds). Per Urales ad Orientem. Iter polyphonicum multilingue. Festskrift tillägnad Juha Janhunen på hans sextioårsdag den 12 februari 2012. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 264. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura, 163–175.
• ----------------- 2012a. The prehistoric Germanic loanword strata in Finnic. In: Riho Grünthal & Petri Kallio (eds). A linguistic map of prehistoric Northern Europe. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 266. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura, 225–238. [www.sgr.fi/sust/sust266/sust266_kallio.pdf]
• ----------------- Ensitavun diftongit kantasuomessa. Sampsa Holopainen & Janne Saarikivi (ed.): Peri orthotētos etymōn. Uusiutuva uralilainen etymologia. Uralica Helsingiensia 11; Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
• Kálmán, Béla. 1976. Chrestomathia Vogulica. Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.
• ----------------- 1988. The history of Ob-Ugric languages. In: Denis Sinor (ed). The Uralic languages: description, history and foreign influences. Handbuch der Orientalistik 8 = Handbook of Uralic studies 1. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 395–412.
• Kalontarov, Ja. 2007. Noviy russko-tajikskiy slovar. (New Russian-Tajik dictionary). Dušanbe.
• ----------------- 2008. Noviy tajiksko-russikiy slovar. (New Tajik-Russian dictionary). Dušanbe.
• Karjalainen, K.F. 1913. Wie EGO im ostjakischen die verwandten benennt. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 13: 207–295. [publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/files/15225/E000007279_1.pdf
• Katz, Hartmut. 2003. Studien zu den älteren indoiranischen Lehnwörtern in den uralischen Sprachen. Aus dem Nachlass herausgegeben von Paul Widmer, Anna Widmer und Gerson Klumpp. Indogermanische Bibliothek. 3. Reihe; Heidelberg: C. Winter.
• Kedaitene, E. I.; Mukriani, K.; Mitrokhina, V.I. 1977. Uchebniy russko-kurdskiy slovar. Moscow: Russkiy yazyk.
• Kempf, Béla. 2008. Review of Sergej Starostin, Anna Dybo and Oleg Mudrak, 2003, Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages, Leiden: Brill. Acta Orientalia Hungarica 61, 403–408.
• Kent, Susan. 1999. Egalitarianism, equality, and equitable power. In: Sweely, Tracy L. Manifesting Power: Gender and the Interpretation of Power in Archaeology. London & New York: Routledge, 30–48.
• Keresztes, László. 1998. Mansi. In: Daniel Abondolo (ed). The Uralic languages. London & New York: Routledge, 387–427.
• Kiselyova, L. N.; Mikolayčik, V. I. 1978. Dari-russkiy slovar (Dari-Russian dictionary). Moscow: Russkiy yazyk.
• Kitanova, M. 1999. Materialy k slovaryu bolgarskih terminov rodstva (Materials of the dictionary of Bulgarian kinship terms). In: Tolstaya, S. M. Kategoriya rodstva v yazyke i kulture (Category of kinship in language and culture). Moscow: Indrik, 279-302.
• Koivulehto, Jorma. 1991. Uralische Evidenz für die Laryngealtheorie. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
• ----------------- 1999. Varhaiset indoeurooppalaiskontaktit: aika ja paikka lainasanojen valossa. Pohjan poluilla. Suomalaisten juuret nykytutkimuksen mukaan. Toimittanut Paul Fogelberg. Bidrag till kännedom av Finlands natur och folk 153; Helsinki: Suomen Tiedeseura, 207–236.
• ----------------- 1999a. Verba Mutuata. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 237. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
• ----------------- 2001a. Zum frühen iranischen und indoiranischen lexikalischen Einfluss auf das Finnisch-Ugrische. Vidyārnavavandanam: essays in honour of Asko Parpola. Edited by Klaus Karttunen & Petteri Koskikallio. Studia Orientalia 94; Helsinki: Finnish Oriental Society. 2001, 359–378.
• ----------------- 2001b. The earliest contacts between Indo-European and Uralic speakers in the light of lexical loans. Early Contacts between Uralic and Indo-European: linguistic and archaeological considerations. Edited by Christian Carpelan, Asko Parpola & Petteri Koskikallio. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 242. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura, 235–264.
• ----------------- 2016. Verba vagantur. Jorma Koivulehto in memoriam. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 274. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
• Korenchy, Éva. 1972. Iranische Lehnwörter in den obugrischen Sprachen. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
• Korn, Agnes. 2005. Towards a Historical Grammar of Balochi. Studies in Balochi Historical Phonology and Vocabulary. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.
• Kümmel, Martin. 2015. Die Schwestern der Eltern: Samische Evidenz für germanische Wortbildung? In: Thomas Krisch & Stefan Niderreiter (eds). Diachronie und Sprachvergleich. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.
• Kurdoev, Kanat K.; Yusupova, Zara. A. 1983. Курдско-русский словарь (Сорани). Moscow: Russkiy yazyk.
• LÄGLOS = Kylstra, A. D. et al. 1991–2012. Lexikon der älteren Germanischen Lehnwörter der ostseefinnischen Sprachen. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
• Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago – London: University of Chicago Press.
• Lang, Andrew. 1908. The origin of terms of human relationship. Proceedings of the British Academy 3, 139–158.
• Langlois, Annie. 2002. Speaking Family Business in in Areyonga Teenage Pitjantjatjara. Australian Journal of Linguistics 22:1, 113–129.
• Lehtiranta, Juhani. 1984 [second edition 2001]. Yhteissaamelainen sanasto. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 200. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
• Ligeti, Lajos. 1986. A magyar nyelv török kapcsolatai a honfoglalás előtt és az Árpád-korban. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
• LIV2 = Rix, Helmut (ed). 2001. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. [2nd edition]. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
• Lytkin, V. I. & Gulyaev, E. S. 1999. Kratkiy etymologicheskiy slovar’ komi jazyka. Syktyvkar: Komi knizhkoye izdatel’stvo.
• Maine, Henry Sumner. 1861. Ancient Law. Its connection with the early history of society, and its relation to modern ideas. London: John Murray.
• Majer, Marek. 2018. Slavic *ljuby ‘love’ < *lewbh-ōs and the heterogeneity of the *-y, *-ъve inflectional class. Paper presented 5.4.2018 at 4. Indogermanische Forschungkolloquium, Zürich.
• Márk, Tamás. 1975. A szamojéd rokonságnevekről. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 77, 162–174. [www.nytud.hu/nyk/reg/077.pdf]
• ----------------- 1997. Über das System der Verwandtschaftsnamen im Samojedischen. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen XLII, 148–162.
• Matras, Yaron. 2010. Contact, Convergence, and Typology. In: Hickley, Raymond (ed.). The Handbook of Language Contact. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell, 66-85
• Metsäranta, Niklas. 2017. Päivitettyjä permiläisiä etymologioita ja rinnastuksia. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 96, 211–241. [www.sgr.fi/susa/96/susa96metsaranta.pdf]
• Milanova, Veronika. 2014. Proto-Indo-European kinship terms. [Master thesis]. Vienna: University of Vienna. [othes.univie.ac.at/33960/]
• ----------------- 2016. (Proto-)Indo-European kinship terms in *-ter and (ancient) age-grade systems. Kin, clan and community – a symposium on Indo-European social institutions. University of Copenhagen, 17. May 2016 [handout]. [www.academia.edu/34436295/_Proto-_Indo-European_kinship_terms_in_-ter_and_ancient_age-grade_systems]
• ----------------- 2017. Patterns of derivation and semantic change in terms of social relations. (A talk at the summer school Roots of Europe, University of Copenhagen, 26 Juy 2017).
• ----------------- (2018 in print) Праиндоевропейские термины родства на *-ter и возрастные степени. Алгебра родства 16, 9–36.
• Moisio, Arto; Saarinen, Sirkka 2008. Tscheremissisches Wörterbuch. Lexica Societatis Fenno-Ugricae XXXII. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
• Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1997 [1871]. Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
• Munkácsi, Bernát. 1901. Árja és kaukázusi elemek a finn-magyar nyelvekben. Budapest: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia.
• Munkácsi, Bernát; Kálmán, Béla. 1986. Wogulisches Wörterbuch. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. [www.babel.gwi.uni-muenchen.de/index.php?abfrage=munka&subnavi=edictionary]
• Murdock, George P. 1968. Patterns of Sibling Terminology. Ethnology 7 (1), 1-24.
• ----------------- 1970. Kin Term Patterns and Their Distribution. Ethnology 9 (2), 165-208
• Musaev, O. İ. 1998. Azerbaijani-English dictionary. Baku: Azerbaycan Dövlet Diller İnst.
• Myers-Scotton, Carol. 2002. Language contact: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• NIL = Wodtko, Dagmar S.; Irslinger, Britta; Schneider Carolin. 2008. Nomina im Indogermanischen Lexikon. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.
• Nirvi, Ruben Erik 1952. Synonyymitutkimuksia sukulaisnimistön alalta. Helsinki: SKS.
• Nussbaum, Alan. 1986. Head and Horn in the Indo-European. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.
• Omar, Feryad Fazil. 2016. Deutsch-Kurdisches Wörterbuch: (Zentralkurdisch/Soranî). Berlin: Institut für Kurdische Studien.
• Oranskiy, Iosif M. 1979. Vvedenie. V.S. Rastorgueva (ed.): Osnovy Iranskogo Jazykoznanija. I. Drevneiranskie jazyki. Akademija Nauk SSSR, 10–128.
• Parpola, Asko. 1999. Varhaisten indoeurooppalaiskontaktien ajoitus ja paikannus kielitieteellisen ja arkeologisen aineiston perusteella. In: Paul Fogelberg (ed). Pohjan poluilla. Suomalaisten juuret nykytutkimuksen mukaan. Bidrag till kännedom av Finlands natur och folk 153. Helsinki: Suomen Tiedeseura.
• ----------------- 2012. Formation of the Indo-European and Uralic (Finno-Ugric) language families in the light of archaeology. In: Riho Grünthal & Petri Kallio (eds). A linguistic map of prehistoric Northern Europe. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 266. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura, 119–184.
• Pârvulescu, Adrian. 1993. IE. *dhughǝtḗr “daughter” and Grassmann’s law. A phonetic and semantic analysis. Indogermanische Forschungen: Zeitschrift für Indogermanistik und Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 98, 55–91.
• ----------------- 1996. IE. *brātēr “brother”. Indogermanische Forschungen: Zeitschrift für Indogermanistik und Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 101, 99–106.
• Pinault, Georges-Jean. 2005. Analyse étymologique d’un nom de parenté indo-européen. In: Günter Schweiger (ed). Indogermanica: Festschrift Gert Klingenschmitt; indische, iranische und indogermanische Studien. Taimering: Schweiger VWT-Verlag, 465–485.
• ----------------- 2007. A Star is born. A “New” PIE *-ter-Suffix. In: Alan J. Nussbaum (ed). Verba Docenti. Studies in historical and Indo-European linguistics presented to Jay H. Jasanoff. Ann Arbor & New York: Beech Stave Press, 271–279.
• ----------------- 2017. The self-representation of the Indo-European society through kinship terms. In: Harald Bichlmeier, Andreas Opfermann (eds). Das Menschenbild bei den Indogermanen. Hamburg: Baar, 81–111.
• Pokorny, Julius. 1959–1969. Indogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: Francke. Ponaryadov, Vadim V. 2012. Насколько достоверный современные реконструкции прафинно-пермского вокализма? Вопросы финно-угорской филологии 3 (8), 78–91.
• Popov, Vladimir A. 1981. Половозрастная стратификация и возрастные классы древнеаканского общества. Советская этнография 6, 89–97. [reprinted in: Алгебра родства 15, 2014.]
• Rahkonen, Pauli. 2013. South-Eastern contact area of Finnic languages in the light of onomastics. [PhD thesis] Helsinki. [helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/38908/southeas.pdf]
• Rahmatullaev, Shavkat. 2000. Uzbek tilining etimologik lugʻati. Tashkent: Universitet.
• Räsänen, Martti. 1920. Die tschuwassischen Lehnwörter im Tscheremissischen. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne XVI. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
• ----------------- 1923. Die tatarischen Lehnwörter im Tscheremissischen. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne L. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
• Rastorgueva, Vera S. et al. 1979–2010. Основы иранского языкознания. Vols. I–V. Moscow: Nauka.
• Read, Dwight W. 2007. Kinship Theory: A Paradigm Shift. Ethnology, 46 (4), 329–64.
• ----------------- 2013. A New Approach to Forming a Typology of Kinship Terminology Systems: From Morgan and Murdock to the Present. Structure and Dynamics 6 (1). [escholarship.org/uc/item/0ss6j8sh]
• Rédei, Károly. 1986. Zu den indogermanisch-uralischen Sprachkontakten, Veröffentlichungen der Kommission für Linguistik und Kommunikationsforschung, Heft 16, Wien, Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
• Rédei, Károly & Róna-Tas, András 1982. Proto-Permian and Votyak loan-words in Chuvash. In: Róna-Tas, Abdrás (ed.) 1982. Studies in Chuvash etymology I. Studia Uralo-Altaica 17. Szeged: University of Szeged, 158–179.
• Róna-Tas, András. 1980. On the earliest Samoyed-Turkish contacts. In: Congressus Quintus Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum III, 377–385.
• ----------------- Turkic Influence on the Uralic Languages. In: Denis Sinor (ed.). The Uralic languages: Description, History, and Foreign Influences. Leiden: E. J. Brill. 742-780.
• Róna-Tas, András; Berta, Arpád. 2011. West Old Turkic. Turkic loanwords in Hungarian. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
• Royrvik, Ellen C. et al. 2018. Genetic patterning in Central Eurasia: population history and pigmentation. The preprint server for biology [posted April 23, 2018: www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/04/23/255117%20.full.pdf+html]
• Ruttkay-Miklián, Eszter. 2007. A szinjai hanti rokonsági terminológia [Kinship terms in Synja Khanty]. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 104, 181–212. [www.nytud.hu/nyk/nyk104.pdf]
• Rykin, Pavel. 2011. The system of kinship and affinity terms in the Middle Mongolian. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 64 (1), 25-47.
• Sahlins, Marchal. 2013. What Kinship Is-And Is Not. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Salminen, Tapani. 2002. Problems in the taxonomy of the Uralic languages in the light of modern comparative studies. In: Лингвистический беспредел: сборник статей к 70-летию А. И. Кузнецовой. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 44–55.
• Sammallahti, Pekka. 1988. Historical phonology of the Uralic languages with special reference to Samoyed, Ugric and Permic. The Uralic languages: description, history and foreign influences. Edited by Denis Sinor. Handbuch der Orientalistik 8: Handbook of Uralic studies 1; Leiden: E. J. Brill. 478–554.
• Sándor, Klára. 2011. Nyelvrokonság és hunhagyomány. Budapest: Typotex.
• Scheffler, Harold W. 1972. Kinship semantics. Annual Review of Anthropology 1, 309–328.
• Schneider, David. 1953. Yap Kinship Terminology and Kin Groups. American Anthropologist 55, 215–236.
• ----------------- 1962. Double descent on Yap. Journal of the Polynesian Society 71 (1), 1–24.
• ----------------- 1980 [1968]. American kinship. A cultural account. [2nd edition] Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• ----------------- 1972. What is Kinship All About? In: Priscilla Reining (ed). Kinship Studies in the Morgan Centennial Year. Washington D.C.: The Anthropological Society of Washington, 32-63. Reprinted in: Parkin, Robert; Stone, Linda (eds.) 2004. Kinship and Family. An anthropological reader. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing, 257-274.
• ----------------- 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
• Schönig, Claus. 1997. A new attempt to classify the Turkic languages (1). Turkic Languages 1/1, 117–133.
• ----------------- 1997a. A new attempt to classify the Turkic languages (2). Turkic Languages 1/2, 262–277.
• ----------------- 1998. A new attempt to classify the Turkic languages (3). Turkic Languages 2/1, 130–151.
• Setälä, E. N. 1900. I.N. Smirnow’s Untersuchung über die Ostfinnen. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 17: 17–28.
• Sevortyan, Ervand V. et al. 1974–2003. Этимологический словарь тюркских языков. Vol. I–VII. Moscow: Nauka/Vostochnaya Literatura.
• Simon, Zsolt. 2018. Vélelmezett indoeurópai jövevényszavak az uráli és finnugor alapnyelvekben [Presentation, Institute of Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 27.4.2018]
• Sinor, Denis (ed). 1990. The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Sköld, Hannes. 1920. Die Ossetischen Lehnwörter im Ungarischen. Lund: Gleerup. Leipzig: Harrassowitz.
• Smirnov, Ivan N. 1889. Черемисы: историко-этнографический очерк. Kazan: Tipografiya imperatorskogo universiteta.
• ----------------- 1891. Пермяки: историко-этнографический очерк. Kazan: Tipografiya imperatorskogo universiteta.
• ----------------- 1895. Мордва: историко-этнографический очерк. Kazan: Tipografiya imperatorskogo universiteta.
• Spooner, Brian. 1966. Iranian Kinship and Marriage. In: Iran 4, 51-59.
• SSA = Itkonen, Erkki; Kulonen, Ulla-Maija (editors-in-chief). 1992–2000. Suomen sanojen alkuperä. Etymologinen sanakirja. I–III. Helsinki: Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus & Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
• Starling database: starling.rinet.ru
• Swadesh, Morris. 1955. Towards greater accuracy in lexicostatistic dating. In: International Journal of American Linguistics 21, 121–137.
• Szemerényi, Oswald. 1977. Studies in the kinship terminology of the Indo-European languages. Acta Iranica 1977. Leiden: Brill.
• Szíj, Enikő. 1998. Термины родства и свойства в удмуртском языке. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
• Tachʼazti, Fedar. 2003. Дигорон-уруссаг дзурдуат. Vladikavkaz: Alania.
• Tadmor, Uri. 2010. Loanwords in the world’s languages: Findings and results. In: Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor (eds). Loanwords in the world's languages: a comparative handbook. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton, 55–75.
• TESz = 1967–1976. A Magyar nyelv történeti-etimológiai szótára. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
• Thomason, Sarah G. 2001. Language contact. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
• Thomsen, Vilhelm. 1869. Den gotiske Sprogklasses Indflydelse paa de finske. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
• Tietze, Andreas. 2002. Sprachgeschichtliches und etymologisches Wörterbuch des Türkei-Türkischen. I. Istanbul & Vienna: Simurg.
• Tsabolov, Ruslan L. 2001–2010. Etimologičeskiy slovar kurdskogo yazyka.. 2 Vols. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura.
• Tunkelo, E. A. 1913. Wortgeschichtliche beiträge. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 13: 74–119.
• UEW = Károly Rédei et al. 1988. Uralisches Etymologisches Worterbuch. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
• Uralonet: online Uralic etymological database of the Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences. [www.uralonet.nytud.hu]
• Werba, Chlodwig. 2005. Sanskrit duhitár- und ihre (indo-)iranischen Verwandten. In: Günter Schweiger (ed). Indogermanica: Festschrift Gert Klingenschmitt; indische, iranische und indogermanische Studien. Taimering: Schweiger VWT-Verlag, 465–485.
• Wichmann, Yrjö. 1903. Die tschuwassischen Lehnwörter in den permischen Sprachen. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne XXI. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura. [fennougrica.kansalliskirjasto.fi/handle/10024/89849
• ----------------- 1924. Etymologisches aus den permischen Sprachen. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen XIV, 29–63.
• Widmer, Anna 2004. Reconnecting and Reconsidering: Remarks on the Final Discussion of the International Linguistic Symposium “Reconnecting Finnic”. Linguistica Uralica 3/2004, 197–212.
• Wierzbicka, Anna. New perspectives on kinship. Overcoming the Eurocentrism and Scientism of Kinship Studies through Lexical Universals. In: Nancy Bonvillain (ed). The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology. London: Routledge, 62–79.
• ----------------- 2016a. Back to ‘Mother’ and ‘Father’. Overcoming the Eurocentrism of Kinship Studies through Eight Lexical Universals. In: Current Anthropology 57 (4), 408-29.
• ----------------- 2017. The meaning of kinship terms. A developmental and cross-linguistic perspective. In: Zhengdai Ye (ed). The Semantics of Nouns. Oxford University Press, 19–62.
• Windfuhr, Gernot (ed). 2009. The Iranian Languages. London & New York: Routledge.
• WOLD = Haspelmath, Martin; Tadmor, Uri (eds). World Loanword Database. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 1830 entries. [wold.clld.org]
• Zadok, Ran. 2009. Iranische Personennamen in der neu- und spätbabylonischen Nebenüberlieferung. Iranische Onomastik 4. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
• Yoshida, Yutaka. 2009. Sogdian. In: Gernot Windfuhr (ed). The Iranian Languages. London & New York: Routledge, 279–335.
• Zalizniak, Anna A. 2008. A catalogue of semantic shifts: Towards a typology of semantic derivation. In: Martine Vanhove (ed). From Polysemy to Semantic Change. Towards a typology of lexical semantic associations. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 217–232.
• Zhivlov, Mikhail. 2006. Реконструкция праобско-угорского вокализма. [Unpublished dissertation] Moscow.
• ----------------- 2010. Studies in Uralic vocalism I: A more economical solution for the reconstruction of the Proto-Permic vowel system. Journal of Language Relationship 4. 167–176.
• ----------------- 2014. Studies in Uralic etymology III. Journal of Language Relationship 12, 113–148.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the following friends and colleagues for the insights they provided:

• Ulla-Maija Forsberg (Uralic)
• Sandra Herrmann (Latvian, Lithuanian)
• Dalina Kallulli (Albanian)
• Shuan O. Karim (Kurdish)
• Agnes Korn (Iranian linguistics, Baluchi)
• Lilijana Listus (Ukrainian)
• Niklas Metsäranta (Uralic, esp. Mari)
• Stephan Procházka (Arabic)
• Velizar Sadovski (Bulgarian)
• Tapani Salminen (Uralic)
• Florian Schwarz (history of Iran and Central Asia)
• Naoki Watanabe (Belarusian)